Comparison
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Acelgas
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Better choice
Côtes de Blettes coupées
Thiriet · 1 kg
Acelgas
Dia · 660 (neto), 425 (escurrido). 720 ml
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes de Blettes coupées | Acelgas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | — |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acelgas has 36% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 22 kcal).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has no fat, while Acelgas has 0.5 g.
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 46% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 64% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Côtes de Blettes coupées
Côtes de blettes
Acelgas
Acelga, agua, sal y antioxidante: ácido ascórbico (E-300).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de Blettes coupées or Acelgas?
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acelgas has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes de Blettes coupées has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.