Côté Brasserie vs Mc Can Cote Resto
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côté Brasserie | Mc Can Cote Resto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 10% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 165 kcal).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 33% less fat (4 g vs 6 g).
- Côté Brasserie has 11% more fiber (4.5 g vs 4 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 17% more protein (3 g vs 2.5 g).
Ingredients
Côté Brasserie
potatoes (89%), sunflower oil (6%), coating (5%): wheat flour, rice flour, corn starch, salt, potato dextrin, up-and-come powders: sodium carbonates, turmeric extract, dye: paprika extract,
Mc Can Cote Resto
Pommes de terre (91,5 %), enrobage (4,5 % : farine de _blé_, farine de riz, amidon de maïs, dextrine de pommes de terre, sel, curcuma, colorant (extrait de paprika)), huile de tournesol,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côté Brasserie or Mc Can Cote Resto?
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mc Can Cote Resto has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côté Brasserie has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.