Condensed Milk vs Kondensmilch gezuckert
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Condensed Milk | Kondensmilch gezuckert |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 325 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 56.4 g | 56 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Condensed Milk
whole milk , sugar,
Kondensmilch gezuckert
55% VOLLMILCH, 45% Zucker, LAKTOSE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Condensed Milk or Kondensmilch gezuckert?
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kondensmilch gezuckert has fewer calories: 325 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kondensmilch gezuckert has less sugar: 56 g versus 56.4 g per 100 g.