2* Gezuckerte Kondensmilch vs Condensed Milk
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2* Gezuckerte Kondensmilch | Condensed Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 331 kcal | 326 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 56.4 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Condensed Milk has 11% less fat (8 g vs 9 g).
- Condensed Milk has 11% less saturated fat (5.4 g vs 6.1 g).
- Condensed Milk has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
2* Gezuckerte Kondensmilch
_Milch_, Zucker
Condensed Milk
whole milk , sugar,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2* Gezuckerte Kondensmilch or Condensed Milk?
Overall, Condensed Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Condensed Milk has fewer calories: 326 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2* Gezuckerte Kondensmilch has less sugar: 55 g versus 56.4 g per 100 g.