Concord Grape Jam vs Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam
Overall, Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Concord Grape Jam | Sugar Free with Fiber Concor... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 60 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 24.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 21.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has 27% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has no sugar, while Concord Grape Jam has 60 g.
- Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has 100% more fiber (24.7 g vs 0 g).
- Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has 100% more protein (21.2 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Concord Grape Jam
CONCORD GRAPES, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, CORN SYRUP, FRUIT PECTIN, CITRIC ACID.
Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam
Water*, maltodextrin*, polydextrose*, concord grape puree concentrate+, citric acid, fruit pectin, locust bean gum *, natural flavor*, sucralose*, potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate (to preserve freshness), calcium chloride*, red #40* and blue #1*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Concord Grape Jam or Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam?
Overall, Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugar Free with Fiber Concord Grape Jam has less sugar: 0 g versus 60 g per 100 g.