Coeur praliné vs Ragusa Classique
Overall, Coeur praliné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coeur praliné | Ragusa Classique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 557 kcal | 580 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coeur praliné has 11% less fat (34 g vs 38 g).
- Ragusa Classique has 12% less saturated fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Coeur praliné has 13% more fiber (2.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Coeur praliné has 15% more protein (8.5 g vs 7.2 g).
- Only Ragusa Classique lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Coeur praliné
Praliné 31 % (pâte de noisettes, sucre) ; sucre ; beurre de cacao ; poudre de lait entier ; graisses végétales (palmiste, palme) ; pâte de cacao ; poudre de lait écrémé ; éclats de noisettes 1,6 % ; cacao maigre en poudre ; émulsifiant : lécithines (tournesol) ; arôme naturel de vanille. Traces de gluten et œufs. Cacao : 30% minimum dans le chocolat.
Ragusa Classique
sugar, hazelnuts (of which 11% whole), cocoa mass, cocoa butter, coconut fat, whole milk powder, soya flour, melted butter, skimmed milk powder, vanilla extract, emulsifier: rapeseed lecithin, may contain: almonds, chocolate: 47% cocoa minimum,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coeur praliné or Ragusa Classique?
Overall, Coeur praliné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coeur praliné has fewer calories: 557 kcal versus 580 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ragusa Classique has less sugar: 47 g versus 50 g per 100 g.