Cockta original vs Pop Cola
Overall, Pop Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Cockta original | Pop Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.3 g | 8.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pop Cola has 17% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Pop Cola has 17% less sugar (8.5 g vs 10.3 g).
- Pop Cola has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cockta original lists: None.
Ingredients
Cockta original
Wasser, Zucker, Kohlendioxid min. 2g/l, pflanzliche Extrakte 0,3%, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Farbstoff: E150d, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumbenzoat, Natürliche Aromen
Pop Cola
apă zahar dioxid de carbon colorant caramel[E150d] exact de ghimbir acidifiant acid fosforic arome naturale extract de nuca de cola aromă cafeina
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cockta original or Pop Cola?
Overall, Pop Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pop Cola has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pop Cola has less sugar: 8.5 g versus 10.3 g per 100 g.