Comparison
Cinnamon Roll vs Canela en rama
Overall, Canela en rama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinnamon Roll | Canela en rama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | — |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canela en rama has no calories, while Cinnamon Roll has 336 kcal.
- Canela en rama has no fat, while Cinnamon Roll has 16 g.
- Canela en rama has no saturated fat, while Cinnamon Roll has 9.2 g.
- Canela en rama has no sugar, while Cinnamon Roll has 16 g.
- Canela en rama has no salt, while Cinnamon Roll has 0.5 g.
- Cinnamon Roll has 77% more protein (4.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Cinnamon Roll
Not available.
Canela en rama
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinnamon Roll or Canela en rama?
Overall, Canela en rama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canela en rama has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canela en rama has less sugar: 0 g versus 16 g per 100 g.