Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice vs Co-op Italian Chopped Tomatoes 230g
Overall, Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice
Co-op Italian Chopped Tomatoes 230g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich T... | Co-op Italian Chopped Tomat... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has 26% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has 35% less sugar (3.3 g vs 5 g).
- Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has 30% more fiber (1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice
TOMATOES (60%), Tomato Juice, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid
Co-op Italian Chopped Tomatoes 230g
Ingredients Tomato (60%), Tomato Juice, Acidity Regulator (Citric acid)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice or Co-op Italian Chopped Tomatoes 230g?
Overall, Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chopped Tomatoes in a Rich Tomato Juice has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.