Comparison

Chopped pork vs Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas

Overall, Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChopped porkPechuga de pollo al horno co...
Nutri-Score — b
NOVA group — —
Calories 182 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 12.5 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 1.8 g
Protein 11.6 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 43% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 182 kcal).
  • Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 80% less fat (2.5 g vs 12.5 g).
  • Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 82% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 20% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 39% more protein (19 g vs 11.6 g).

Ingredients

Chopped pork

Not available.

Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chopped pork or Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas?

Overall, Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chopped pork has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons