Chopped pork vs Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas
Overall, Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chopped pork | Pechuga de pollo al horno co... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 182 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 43% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 182 kcal).
- Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 80% less fat (2.5 g vs 12.5 g).
- Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 82% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 4.4 g).
- Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 20% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has 39% more protein (19 g vs 11.6 g).
Ingredients
Chopped pork
Not available.
Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chopped pork or Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas?
Overall, Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pechuga de pollo al horno con hierbas has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chopped pork has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.