Comparison

Chocolate premium hot cocoa vs Ovomaltine

Overall, Ovomaltine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolate premium hot cocoaOvomaltine
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 389 kcal 376 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 5.6 g 0.9 g
Sugars 69.4 g 51.1 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 4 g
Protein 5.6 g 9.5 g
Additives52
AllergensMilk, SoybeansGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ovomaltine has 73% less fat (1.9 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Ovomaltine has 84% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Ovomaltine has 26% less sugar (51.1 g vs 69.4 g).
  • Ovomaltine has 65% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Ovomaltine has 41% more protein (9.5 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Only Chocolate premium hot cocoa lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Ovomaltine lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Chocolate premium hot cocoa

Sugar, cocoa processed with alkali, creamer (coconut oil, maltodextrin, sodium caseinate (milk derivative), silicon dioxide, sodium citrate, soy lecithin), nonfat dry milk, whey powder, salt, guar gum, gum arabic, natural flavor (contains dairy), silicon dioxide (to prevent caking)

Ovomaltine

GERSTENMALZEXTRAKT 51%, kondensierte MAGERMILCH, kondensiertes MILCHSERUM, fettarmes Kakaopulver 13%, Zucker, Fruktose, Mineralstoffe (Magnesiumcarbonat, Dicalciumphosphat), Rapsöl, Vitamine (E, C, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, B6, Folsäure, B12, Biotin, Pantothen - säure), Speisesalz, Aroma Vanillin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolate premium hot cocoa or Ovomaltine?

Overall, Ovomaltine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ovomaltine has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ovomaltine has less sugar: 51.1 g versus 69.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons