Chocolate premium hot cocoa vs Jibi
Overall, Jibi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolate premium hot cocoa | Jibi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 69.4 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jibi has 80% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Jibi has 77% less fat (1.6 g vs 6.9 g).
- Jibi has 80% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 5.6 g).
- Jibi has 90% less sugar (7.1 g vs 69.4 g).
- Jibi has no salt, while Chocolate premium hot cocoa has 1.4 g.
- Chocolate premium hot cocoa has 41% more protein (5.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Chocolate premium hot cocoa lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolate premium hot cocoa
Sugar, cocoa processed with alkali, creamer (coconut oil, maltodextrin, sodium caseinate (milk derivative), silicon dioxide, sodium citrate, soy lecithin), nonfat dry milk, whey powder, salt, guar gum, gum arabic, natural flavor (contains dairy), silicon dioxide (to prevent caking)
Jibi
المعلومات الغذائية ل مل 100 الطاقة (تحول كل الدهون (غرام بما فيها: أحماض دهنية مشبعة (عراء 1.1 السكريك (غرام بما فيها: السكر (غرام بروتينات (عرام) ملح (عراء): الكالسيوم (مة) الفوسفور (من): TEL 1,6 12.3 7,1 3,3 O 129 101
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolate premium hot cocoa or Jibi?
Overall, Jibi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jibi has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jibi has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 69.4 g per 100 g.