Jibi vs Ovomaltine Drink
Overall, Jibi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Jibi | Ovomaltine Drink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 9.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jibi has 20% less fat (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Jibi has 23% less sugar (7.1 g vs 9.2 g).
- Ovomaltine Drink has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Only Ovomaltine Drink lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Jibi
المعلومات الغذائية ل مل 100 الطاقة (تحول كل الدهون (غرام بما فيها: أحماض دهنية مشبعة (عراء 1.1 السكريك (غرام بما فيها: السكر (غرام بروتينات (عرام) ملح (عراء): الكالسيوم (مة) الفوسفور (من): TEL 1,6 12.3 7,1 3,3 O 129 101
Ovomaltine Drink
LAIT entier 44%, eau, LAIT écrémé 22%, poudre pour boisson à base de malt Ovomaltine 7.5% (extrait de malt d'ORGE 3.3%, LAIT écrémé condense, sucre, cacao en poudre fortement dégraissé, LAIT entier en poudre, LAIT écrémé en poudre, sels minéraux (orthophosphate dicalcique, carbonate de magnésium), sel de cuisine, arôme (vanilline)), sucre, correcteurs d'acidité (orthophosphate dicalcique, carbonate de magnésium), épaississant (carraghénane), vitamines (E, thiamine, riboflavine, niacine, B6, acide folique, biotine, acide pantothénique).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jibi or Ovomaltine Drink?
Overall, Jibi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jibi has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jibi has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.