Comparison

Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco vs Vegan chocolate with walnuts

Overall, Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat Vegan Lait de cocoVegan chocolate with walnuts
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 554 kcal 567 kcal
Fat 37 g 36.9 g
Saturated fat 26 g 17.7 g
Sugars 39 g 45.2 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 6.9 g 2.9 g
Protein 5.2 g 3.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vegan chocolate with walnuts has 32% less saturated fat (17.7 g vs 26 g).
  • Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has 14% less sugar (39 g vs 45.2 g).
  • Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has 58% more fiber (6.9 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has 37% more protein (5.2 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Only Vegan chocolate with walnuts lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco

Sucre de fleur de coco (40%), pâte de cacao, noix de coco râpée (15%), beurre de cacao, lait de coco en poudre (5%) (lait de coco (75%), maltodextrine), gousse de vanille. Peut contenir des traces de lait, de noisettes et d'amandes.

Vegan chocolate with walnuts

sugar, cocoa butter, 13% hazelnuts, dehydrated rice syrup, cocoa mass, hazelnut mass, emulsifier: lecithins (sunflower): natural vanilla flavour, possible traces of almonds, pecans, milk, eggs and cereals containing gluten,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco or Vegan chocolate with walnuts?

Overall, Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has fewer calories: 554 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat Vegan Lait de coco has less sugar: 39 g versus 45.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons