Chocolat noir café amande vs Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern
Overall, Chocolat noir café amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chocolat noir café amande
Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat noir café amande | Espressozartbitterschokolade... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 573 kcal | 570 kcal |
| Fat | 40 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 31 g | 41 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat noir café amande has 24% less sugar (31 g vs 41 g).
- Chocolat noir café amande has 47% more protein (9.2 g vs 4.9 g).
- Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chocolat noir café amande lists: Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolat noir café amande
Pâte de cacao 50%, sucre de canne, amande grillée 7%, beurre de cacao, café en poudre 2%, émulsifiant lécithine de soja (non OGN), cacao 59% minimum.
Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern
Zucker (Vollrohrzucker. Rohrzucker°). Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter. Espressobohnen gemahlen 7 %.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat noir café amande or Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern?
Overall, Chocolat noir café amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Espressozartbitterschokolade mit Espressobohnensplittern has fewer calories: 570 kcal versus 573 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat noir café amande has less sugar: 31 g versus 41 g per 100 g.