Chocolat noir aux raisins secs vs Chocolat equador
Overall, Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Chocolat noir aux raisins secs
Chocolat equador
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat noir aux raisins se... | Chocolat equador |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 544 kcal |
| Fat | 44.9 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 27.7 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 22.6 g | 37 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | 9.1 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat equador has 20% less fat (36 g vs 44.9 g).
- Chocolat equador has 17% less saturated fat (23 g vs 27.7 g).
- Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has 39% less sugar (22.6 g vs 37 g).
- Chocolat equador has 11% more protein (8.4 g vs 7.5 g).
- Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Chocolat noir aux raisins secs is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chocolat equador lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chocolat noir aux raisins secs
pâte de cacao*, raisins secs* 18%, sucre de canne non raffiné", beurre de cacao.
Chocolat equador
Pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, jus de citron vert concentré 1 %, amidon de tapioca, lécithines, extrait de vanille, arôme naturel de citron et de gingembre, huile essentielle de citron vert.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat noir aux raisins secs or Chocolat equador?
Overall, Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has fewer calories: 542 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat noir aux raisins secs has less sugar: 22.6 g versus 37 g per 100 g.