Chocolat equador vs Bournville Old Jamaica
Overall, Chocolat equador has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat equador | Bournville Old Jamaica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 490 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 23 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 60 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 6.1 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bournville Old Jamaica has 36% less fat (23 g vs 36 g).
- Bournville Old Jamaica has 43% less saturated fat (13 g vs 23 g).
- Chocolat equador has 38% less sugar (37 g vs 60 g).
- Chocolat equador has 33% more fiber (9.1 g vs 6.1 g).
- Chocolat equador has 52% more protein (8.4 g vs 4 g).
- Only Chocolat equador lists: Gluten.
- Only Bournville Old Jamaica lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolat equador
Pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, jus de citron vert concentré 1 %, amidon de tapioca, lécithines, extrait de vanille, arôme naturel de citron et de gingembre, huile essentielle de citron vert.
Bournville Old Jamaica
Sugar, cocoa mass, raisins, palm oil, cocoa butter, emulsifiers (SOYA lecithins, E476), flavouring, skimmed MILK powder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat equador or Bournville Old Jamaica?
Overall, Chocolat equador has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bournville Old Jamaica has fewer calories: 490 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat equador has less sugar: 37 g versus 60 g per 100 g.