Chocolat blanc 32% amandes vs Milka Copaya
Overall, Chocolat blanc 32% amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat blanc 32% amandes | Milka Copaya |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 605 kcal | 546 kcal |
| Fat | 41.2 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.4 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 58 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milka Copaya has 22% less fat (32 g vs 41.2 g).
- Chocolat blanc 32% amandes has 31% less sugar (40 g vs 58 g).
- Chocolat blanc 32% amandes has 56% more protein (12.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Only Milka Copaya lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolat blanc 32% amandes
32% Mandeln, Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver, Sahnepulver, Molkenerzeugnis, Emulgator: Lecithine (Sonnenblume); Speisesalz, natürliches Vanille-Aroma
Milka Copaya
Sucre, beurre de cacao, lait écrémé en poudre, lactosérum en poudre (de lait), morceaux d'amandes (7%), flocons de noix de coco (5%), beurre concentré, émulsifiant (lécithines de soja), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat blanc 32% amandes or Milka Copaya?
Overall, Chocolat blanc 32% amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milka Copaya has fewer calories: 546 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat blanc 32% amandes has less sugar: 40 g versus 58 g per 100 g.