Chocolat au lait fleur de sel vs Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime
Overall, Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chocolat au lait fleur de sel
Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat au lait fleur de se... | Organic rich milk chocolate... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 542 kcal | 574 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 38.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 48.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has 11% less fat (34 g vs 38.3 g).
- Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has 35% more protein (11 g vs 7.2 g).
Ingredients
Chocolat au lait fleur de sel
Not available.
Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat au lait fleur de sel or Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime?
Overall, Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has fewer calories: 542 kcal versus 574 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat au lait fleur de sel has less sugar: 45 g versus 48.6 g per 100 g.