Comparison

Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel vs Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat au lait Fleur de se...Organic rich milk chocolate...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 572 kcal 574 kcal
Fat 37 g 38.3 g
Saturated fat 23 g 23 g
Sugars 50 g 48.6 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 3.5 g 1.8 g
Protein 7.4 g 7.2 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel has 49% more fiber (3.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Only Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel

Chocolat au lait* 40% de cacao minimum (sucre de canne*, beurre de cacao*, poudre de lait entier*: 20%, pâte de cacao*), fleur de sel de Noirmoutier : 1%. Peut contenir des traces de gluten, d'œuf, d'arachides, de fruits à coque et de sésame. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel or Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat au lait Fleur de sel has fewer calories: 572 kcal versus 574 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Organic rich milk chocolate cornish sea salt and lime has less sugar: 48.6 g versus 50 g per 100 g.

More comparisons