Chocoladehagel puur vs 100% Pindakaas
Overall, 100% Pindakaas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocoladehagel puur | 100% Pindakaas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 428 kcal | 600 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 47.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.8 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 64 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | 9.3 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 27.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Peanuts, Pinda |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocoladehagel puur has 29% fewer calories (428 kcal vs 600 kcal).
- Chocoladehagel puur has 68% less fat (15 g vs 47.3 g).
- 100% Pindakaas has 32% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8.8 g).
- 100% Pindakaas has 91% less sugar (6 g vs 64 g).
- 100% Pindakaas has 27% more fiber (9.3 g vs 6.8 g).
- 100% Pindakaas has 82% more protein (27.3 g vs 5 g).
- 100% Pindakaas has the better Nutri-Score.
- 100% Pindakaas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chocoladehagel puur lists: Milk, Soybeans.
- Only 100% Pindakaas lists: Peanuts, Pinda.
Ingredients
Chocoladehagel puur
Suiker, magere cacaopoeder*, cacaoboter, emulgator (sojalecithine), gefractioneerd melkvet (harde fractie), natuurlijk aroma.
100% Pindakaas
Pinda
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocoladehagel puur or 100% Pindakaas?
Overall, 100% Pindakaas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocoladehagel puur has fewer calories: 428 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
100% Pindakaas has less sugar: 6 g versus 64 g per 100 g.