Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade vs Patatas fritas
Overall, Patatas fritas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade | Patatas fritas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 522 kcal | 575 kcal |
| Fat | 29.8 g | 38.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has 23% less fat (29.8 g vs 38.5 g).
- Patatas fritas has 86% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Patatas fritas has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Patatas fritas has 13% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.9 g).
- Patatas fritas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade
Not available.
Patatas fritas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade or Patatas fritas?
Overall, Patatas fritas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has fewer calories: 522 kcal versus 575 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas fritas has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.