Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière vs Buckwheat Cakes
Overall, Buckwheat Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips de sarrasin à la Fores... | Buckwheat Cakes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 565 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buckwheat Cakes has 39% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 565 kcal).
- Buckwheat Cakes has no fat, while Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière has 37 g.
- Buckwheat Cakes has no saturated fat, while Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière has 3 g.
- Buckwheat Cakes has no sugar, while Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière has 0.7 g.
- Buckwheat Cakes has no salt, while Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière has 0.8 g.
- Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière has 100% more fiber (4 g vs 0 g).
- Buckwheat Cakes has 27% more protein (12.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Buckwheat Cakes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Buckwheat Cakes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière
Farine de sarrasin (France)(57%), huile de tournesol (37%) , farine de mais, sel de guėrande (0,8%), arôme naturel, ail, champignon déshydraté, oignon, persil
Buckwheat Cakes
buckwheat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips de sarrasin à la Forestière or Buckwheat Cakes?
Overall, Buckwheat Cakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buckwheat Cakes has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 565 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buckwheat Cakes has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.