Chilli tuna vs Tuna Steak
Overall, Chilli tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chilli tuna | Tuna Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 184 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Steak has 10% less fat (9 g vs 10 g).
- Chilli tuna has 79% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 6.8 g).
- Chilli tuna has no sugar, while Tuna Steak has 1 g.
- Tuna Steak has 23% more protein (26 g vs 20 g).
- Chilli tuna has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chilli tuna
tonhal (Katsuwonus pelamis), napraforgóolaj, chili 1,2%, só.
Tuna Steak
PRISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER FE (RO) Toh bucati in ulei de floarea-soarelui cu aroma naturală de fum, Conserva de peste, Produs Sterilizat, Ingrediente: ton (Katsuwonus pelamis) 70,5 %, ulei de floarea-soarelui, sare, aroma de fum 0,3%, A se păstra la loc uscat si racoros ferit de razele soarelui si de inghet, A se folosi imediat dupa deschidere, Metoda de pescuit: Năvoade înconjuratoare - návoade filtrante, Produs in:Flip) (HU) TONHALDARABOK NAPRAFORGOOLAJBAN füstölt ízesítéssel, Halkonzerv, Hökezet Osszetevők: tonhal (Katsuwonus pelamis) 70,5 %, napraforgóolaj, só, füstaroma 0,3%, Száraz, hivos helyen tárolandó, Felbontás utan hütve tárolandó és két napon belül elfogyasztandó, Halasza eszközök: Kerítőhálók és emelőhálók - erszényes kerítőhálók, Gyártás helye: Fülöp-szigetek Cantitate Netă după scurgere: 120g 170 ge Töltötömeg (lecsepegtetett tömeg): ER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER KAISER www,gaston,ca oil Cantitate Neta: Nettó tömeg: *
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chilli tuna or Tuna Steak?
Overall, Chilli tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilli tuna has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 184 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chilli tuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.