Comparison

Chili Végétal vs Chili sin carne

Overall, Chili Végétal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili VégétalChili sin carne
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 107 kcal 101 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.4 g
Sugars 2.4 g 1.1 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 4.3 g 3.3 g
Protein 9.3 g 4.8 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili sin carne has 54% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Chili Végétal has 23% more fiber (4.3 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Chili Végétal has 48% more protein (9.3 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Chili Végétal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chili Végétal lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chili Végétal

Eau, haricots rouges* secs trempés 22%, légumes* en morceaux 19% [pulpe de tomates*, oignons*, poivrons rouges*, maïs*, carottes*], protéines de SOJA* texturées à base de farine de SOJA déshuilée 12%, purée de tomates* mi-réduite, purée de tomates* double concentrée, huile d'olive* vierge extra, amidon de manioc*, sel marin, épices*, purée d'ail*, origan*. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir des traces de gluten et graines de SESAME.

Chili sin carne

Riz cuit 35%, tomates 18%. haricots rouges 12%, eau, poivrons rouges 6%, protéines de pois texturées" 3%, oignons " 3%, double concentré de tomates 1%, huile d'olive vierge extra", purée d'ail", épices" 0.8%, huile de tournesol", sel, amidon"

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili Végétal or Chili sin carne?

Overall, Chili Végétal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili sin carne has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chili sin carne has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons