Chili recette végétarienne vs Chili sin carne
Overall, Chili recette végétarienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili recette végétarienne | Chili sin carne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 4.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili recette végétarienne has 37% less fat (1.9 g vs 3 g).
- Chili sin carne has 69% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Chili recette végétarienne has 20% more protein (6 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chili recette végétarienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chili recette végétarienne lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chili recette végétarienne
Eau, tomate* (coulis*, double concentré*), haricots rouges* réhydrates 11%, courgettes* 8%, carottes* 7%, oignons* 6%, poivrons* 6%, protéines de soja* 5%, pois chiches* réhydratés, huile d'olive* vierge extra extraite à froid, épices*, sel de mer, ail, basilic.
Chili sin carne
Riz cuit 35%, tomates 18%. haricots rouges 12%, eau, poivrons rouges 6%, protéines de pois texturées" 3%, oignons " 3%, double concentré de tomates 1%, huile d'olive vierge extra", purée d'ail", épices" 0.8%, huile de tournesol", sel, amidon"
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili recette végétarienne or Chili sin carne?
Overall, Chili recette végétarienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili recette végétarienne has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili sin carne has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.