Chicken Fajita Wrap vs Be wrappy poulet rôti façon fajitas
Overall, Chicken Fajita Wrap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chicken Fajita Wrap | Be wrappy poulet rôti façon... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 9.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 13 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicken Fajita Wrap has 25% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Be wrappy poulet rôti façon fajitas has 29% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Chicken Fajita Wrap has 15% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Chicken Fajita Wrap has 57% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Chicken Fajita Wrap has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chicken Fajita Wrap lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Chicken Fajita Wrap
*Wheatflour* contains *Gluten* (with *Wheatflour*, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Chicken Breast (19%), Water, Avocado (5%), Onions (5%), Spinach, Black Beans (3.5%), Red Peppers (2.5%), Yellow Peppers (2.5%), Full Fat Soft Cheese (*Milk*), Sour Cream (*Milk*), Borlotti Beans, Palm Oil, Vegetable Oil (Rapeseed/Sunflower), Farmhouse Cheddar Cheese (*Milk*), Humectant: Glycerol, Ground Spices (Smoked Paprika Chillies Cumin Coriander Chipotle Chillies Cloves Cayenne Pepper Cinnamon), Red Wine Vinegar, Sugar, Malted Wheatflakes (contain *Gluten*), Olive Oil, Rapeseed Oil, Raising Agents: E500, E450, Salt, Pasteurised Lime Juice, Demerara Sugar, Tomatoes, Garlic Purée, Dried Garlic, Sprouted Buckwheat Seeds, Sprouted *Spelt* Flour (*Wheat* contains *Gluten*), Sprouted *Wheatflour* (contains *Gluten*), Dried Onions, Cracked Black Pepper, Cornflour, Chives, Acidity Regulator: Malic Acid, Maltodextrin, Pasteurised *Egg* Yolk, Oregano, Dried *Egg*, Flavouring, Wheatgerm (contains *Gluten*), Tomato Paste, Yeast Extract, White Wine Vinegar, Ground Bay Leaves, Garlic, *Wheat* Starch (contains *Gluten*), Concentrated Lemon Juice, Mustard Extract, Colour: Paprika Extract
Be wrappy poulet rôti façon fajitas
Galette de blé à la tomate 48% (farine de blé 30%, eau, huile de colza, sel, poudre de tomate 0,4%, paprika, poudre à lever: carbonate de sodium, basilic), sauce salsa 13% [eau, pulpe de tomate (tomates, jus de tomates, acidifiant: acide citrique), oignons, purée de tomate, vinaigre d'alcool, huile de colza, purée de poivron rouge, amidon, sucre, épices, sel, poudre de tomate, jus de citron concentré, épaississant: gomme guar], viande de poulet rôti traitée en salaison préparé en France 17% (viande de poulet origine UE, eau, acidifiants: lactate de potassium - acétates de potassium, dextrose, amidon de pomme de terre et amidon transformé de pomme de terre, sel, stabilisants: triphosphates, sucre roux, antioxydant: érythorbate de sodium), salade 8%, cheddar fondu (cheddar, fromages, eau, amidons transformés, protéines de lait, lait écrémé en poudre, beurre, sel de fonte: citrates de sodium, gelifiant: carraghénanes, colorant: bixine de rocou), tomate 5%, amidon transformé de pomme de terre. (% exprimés sur le produit fini). Informations en gras destinées aux personnes allergiques. Traces éventuelles de moutarde, d'œuf, poissons, crustacés, céleri, graines de sesame, fruits à coques, soja et lupin. Candice Consommateurs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chicken Fajita Wrap or Be wrappy poulet rôti façon fajitas?
Overall, Chicken Fajita Wrap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicken Fajita Wrap has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Fajita Wrap has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.