Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas vs Cortezas de trigo
Overall, Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas | Cortezas de trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 429 kcal | 486 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has 12% fewer calories (429 kcal vs 486 kcal).
- Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has 45% less fat (12 g vs 22 g).
- Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has 68% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.4 g).
- Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has 11% less sugar (3.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Cortezas de trigo has 12% more protein (7.5 g vs 6.6 g).
Ingredients
Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas
Not available.
Cortezas de trigo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas or Cortezas de trigo?
Overall, Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 486 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chasis barbacoa pintalenguas has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.