Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 vs Amandes râpées
Overall, Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956
Amandes râpées
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne Mesnil A. Salon &... | Amandes râpées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 12 kcal | 612 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has 98% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 612 kcal).
- Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has no fat, while Amandes râpées has 53 g.
- Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has no saturated fat, while Amandes râpées has 4.3 g.
- Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has 65% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4 g).
- Amandes râpées has 99% more protein (29 g vs 0.3 g).
- Only Amandes râpées lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956
Champagne
Amandes râpées
Fibres/fibre/vezels Sel/salt/zout 26g 9,9g 0,05 g FR AMANDES BLANCHIES EN POUDRE EXTRA-FINE Peut contenir des traces de soja, fruits à coque, gluten, œuf et lait. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice. Conservation:
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 or Amandes râpées?
Overall, Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.