Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 vs Eau minérale naturelle
Overall, Eau minérale naturelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956
Eau minérale naturelle
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne Mesnil A. Salon &... | Eau minérale naturelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 12 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eau minérale naturelle has no calories, while Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has 12 kcal.
- Eau minérale naturelle has no sugar, while Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has 1.4 g.
- Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Eau minérale naturelle is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956
Champagne
Eau minérale naturelle
Eau minérale naturelle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne Mesnil A. Salon & Cie 1956 or Eau minérale naturelle?
Overall, Eau minérale naturelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eau minérale naturelle has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 12 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eau minérale naturelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.