Comparison

Chair de tomate vs Chair de Tomates au Basilic

Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChair de tomateChair de Tomates au Basilic
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 24 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 g
Sugars 2.6 g 4 g
Salt 0.6 g 1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 2.5 g
Protein 1.3 g 1.3 g
Additives01
AllergensCeleryGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chair de tomate has 49% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 47 kcal).
  • Chair de tomate has 72% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Chair de tomate has no saturated fat, while Chair de Tomates au Basilic has 0.4 g.
  • Chair de tomate has 35% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4 g).
  • Chair de tomate has 39% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Chair de tomate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chair de tomate lists: Celery.
  • Only Chair de Tomates au Basilic lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Chair de tomate

Pulpe de tomates* (Origine France) 99,4%, sel marin non raffine. *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait, moutarde et céleri

Chair de Tomates au Basilic

Pulpe de tomates* 91% (tomate origine France), oignons*, huile de tournesol*, sel marin, sucre de canne*, épices* et plantes aromatiques* 0,3% (dont basilic* 0,18%), amidon de pomme de terre*, arôme naturel de basilic 0,03%, acidifiant : acide citrique. * biologique Traces éventuelles de céleri, lait, moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chair de tomate or Chair de Tomates au Basilic?

Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chair de tomate has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chair de tomate has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons