Chair de tomate vs Chair de tomate
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chair de tomate | Chair de tomate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chair de tomate has no fat, while Chair de tomate has 0.5 g.
- Chair de tomate has 37% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Chair de tomate has 63% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Chair de tomate has 28% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Chair de tomate has 31% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Chair de tomate lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Chair de tomate
Pulpe de tomates* (Origine France) 99,4%, sel marin non raffine. *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait, moutarde et céleri
Chair de tomate
Tomates 70%, purée de tomates 29,2%, sucre, sel, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chair de tomate or Chair de tomate?
Overall, Chair de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair de tomate has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chair de tomate has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.