Comparison

Cerelac vs Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli

Overall, Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCerelacSabbiolina di grano Cappelli
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 418 kcal 353 kcal
Fat 9 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 33 g 2.7 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber 2.5 g 2.9 g
Protein 15 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has 16% fewer calories (353 kcal vs 418 kcal).
  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has 93% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 4 g).
  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has 92% less sugar (2.7 g vs 33 g).
  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has no salt, while Cerelac has 0.4 g.
  • Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has 14% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Cerelac has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Cerelac lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Cerelac

Farine de blé et farine de blé hydrolysé, lait partiellement écrémé, saccharose, huile de tournesol, substances minérales (carbonate de calcium, fumarate ferreux, sulfate de zinc, iodure de potassium), vitamines (C, PP, E, B1, acide pantothénique, A, B6, K, acide folique, biotine, D), agent aromatisant (vanilline), culture de blifidobactéries.

Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli

CON VITAMINA B1* GRANO DURO ITALIANO

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cerelac or Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli?

Overall, Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sabbiolina di grano Cappelli has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 33 g per 100 g.

More comparisons