Comparison
Cavatappi vs Cavatappi
Overall, Cavatappi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cavatappi | Cavatappi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | — |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cavatappi has 27% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Cavatappi lists: Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Cavatappi
Not available.
Cavatappi
Durumhvede Semolina, Rødbede 2%, Spinat 2%, Paprika 2%, Sort gulerod 2%, æg, soja, sennep
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cavatappi or Cavatappi?
Overall, Cavatappi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cavatappi has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cavatappi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.