Comparison
Cavatappi vs Cavatappi
Overall, Cavatappi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cavatappi | Cavatappi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cavatappi has no saturated fat, while Cavatappi has 0.8 g.
- Cavatappi has 16% more fiber (3.6 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Cavatappi
Not available.
Cavatappi
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cavatappi or Cavatappi?
Overall, Cavatappi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cavatappi has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cavatappi has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.