Comparison
Catdinal vs Wacky Sticks
Overall, Wacky Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Catdinal | Wacky Sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 56.7 g | 57 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | — | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wacky Sticks has 46% less fat (3.6 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Catdinal lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Catdinal
Zucker, Glucosesirup, Wasser, Schokolade 18% (Kakaomasse min. 43%, Soja, Aromen, Zitronensäure, Agar
Wacky Sticks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Catdinal or Wacky Sticks?
Overall, Wacky Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wacky Sticks has fewer calories: 389 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Catdinal has less sugar: 56.7 g versus 57 g per 100 g.