Cassis . Rines neri vs Cassis
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassis . Rines neri | Cassis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 57 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 25 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassis has 83% fewer calories (57 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Cassis has 79% less fat (0.9 g vs 4 g).
- Cassis has no saturated fat, while Cassis . Rines neri has 0.5 g.
- Cassis has 86% less sugar (8 g vs 59 g).
- Cassis . Rines neri has 77% more fiber (25 g vs 5.8 g).
- Cassis . Rines neri has 54% more protein (2.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cassis has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassis . Rines neri
Cassis 67%*, Concentré de jus de pomme*, huile de tournesol*. * De production biologique étrangère. Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique. Les agriculteurs travaillent en harmonie avec la nature. Contrôle indépendant. Certification bio: CH-BIO-006, bio.inspecta AG.
Cassis
Cassis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassis . Rines neri or Cassis?
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassis has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassis has less sugar: 8 g versus 59 g per 100 g.