Cashew vs Rich and indulgent Hazelnut
Overall, Cashew has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cashew | Rich and indulgent Hazelnut |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cashew has 17% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Cashew has 90% less sugar (0.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Rich and indulgent Hazelnut has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Cashew is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cashew
Spring water, Organic Cashews 5%, Sea salt.
Rich and indulgent Hazelnut
Wasser, Zucker, Haselnüsse (2,8%), Calcium (Tricalciumphosphat), Meersalz, Stabilisatoren (Johannisbrotkernmehl, Gellan], Emulgator (Lecithine), Vitamine B2, B12, D2, E. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cashew or Rich and indulgent Hazelnut?
Overall, Cashew has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cashew has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cashew has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.