Comparison

Cannelloni vs Cannelloni tubos precocidos

Overall, Cannelloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCannelloniCannelloni tubos precocidos
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 360 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.5 g 3.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.9 g 3 g
Protein 12 g 11.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cannelloni has 57% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Cannelloni has 23% more fiber (3.9 g vs 3 g).
  • Cannelloni has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Cannelloni tubos precocidos is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Cannelloni

Harina de _trigo_.

Cannelloni tubos precocidos

Sémola de _trigo_ duro, agua 12,5%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cannelloni or Cannelloni tubos precocidos?

Overall, Cannelloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cannelloni tubos precocidos has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cannelloni has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons