Comparison
Camden Pale Ale vs IPA
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Camden Pale Ale | IPA |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- IPA has no sugar, while Camden Pale Ale has 0.5 g.
- Only Camden Pale Ale lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Camden Pale Ale
Water, _malted barley_, _wheat_, hops, yeast
IPA
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Camden Pale Ale or IPA?
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Camden Pale Ale has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
IPA has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.