Comparison
Biere vs Camden Pale Ale
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Biere | Camden Pale Ale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Camden Pale Ale has 14% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Only Camden Pale Ale lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Biere
Not available.
Camden Pale Ale
Water, _malted barley_, _wheat_, hops, yeast
FAQ
Which is healthier: Biere or Camden Pale Ale?
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Camden Pale Ale has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biere has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.