Comparison
IPA vs Defender IPA
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | IPA | Defender IPA |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- IPA has 13% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Only Defender IPA lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
IPA
Not available.
Defender IPA
Eau, _Malt d'Orge_, Houblons et Extrait de Houblon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: IPA or Defender IPA?
Overall, IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
IPA has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
IPA has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.