Calendrier de l'Avent vs Rocas de chocolate
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Calendrier de l'Avent
Rocas de chocolate
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Calendrier de l'Avent | Rocas de chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 540 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 22.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 61 g | 57.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocas de chocolate has 25% less fat (22.4 g vs 30 g).
- Rocas de chocolate has 23% less saturated fat (13.9 g vs 18 g).
- Calendrier de l'Avent has 18% more protein (6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Calendrier de l'Avent lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Calendrier de l'Avent
Sucre, beurre de cacao, lait en poudre, pâte de cacao, poudre de petit lait, émulsifiants (lécithine de soja, E476), arôme naturel,
Rocas de chocolate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Calendrier de l'Avent or Rocas de chocolate?
Overall, Rocas de chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocas de chocolate has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 540 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocas de chocolate has less sugar: 57.5 g versus 61 g per 100 g.