Comparison

Caillé de brebis chocolat vs Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat

Overall, Caillé de brebis chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaillé de brebis chocolatLe dessert fondant au lait d...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 135 kcal 154 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 8.3 g
Saturated fat 4.1 g 5.8 g
Sugars 14 g 13 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 1 g
Protein 4.9 g 6.2 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caillé de brebis chocolat has 12% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 154 kcal).
  • Caillé de brebis chocolat has 20% less fat (6.6 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Caillé de brebis chocolat has 29% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat has 21% more protein (6.2 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Caillé de brebis chocolat lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Caillé de brebis chocolat

Lait de brebis (Origine : France), suce 82%, chocolat noir 2% (pate de cacao, sucre, émulsifiant: lécithine de soja), poudre de cacao 2 %présure.

Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat

Lait entier de brebis (origine UE), sucre, lait entier de brebis en chocolat 4% (poudre de cacao, pâte de cacao, pasteurisé 84% poudre (origine: UE), sucre), presure.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caillé de brebis chocolat or Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat?

Overall, Caillé de brebis chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caillé de brebis chocolat has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Le dessert fondant au lait de brebis chocolat has less sugar: 13 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons