Comparison
Burrata vs Burrata
Overall, Burrata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burrata | Burrata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burrata has 60% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Burrata has 43% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Burrata has 18% more protein (9.8 g vs 8 g).
- Only Burrata lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Burrata
Not available.
Burrata
_Lait_ pasteurisé, _crème_ UHT 41%, correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique, sel, présure, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burrata or Burrata?
Overall, Burrata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burrata has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burrata has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.