Comparison
Burrata vs Burrata
Overall, Burrata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burrata | Burrata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 257 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burrata has 39% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- Burrata has 14% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Burrata has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Burrata has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
- Burrata has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Burrata lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Burrata
_Lait_ de vache pasteurisé, crème légère UHT à 27% de Mat. Gr. (35%), sel, coagulant microbien.
Burrata
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burrata or Burrata?
Overall, Burrata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burrata has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burrata has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.