Comparison
Bucatini vs Bucatini N*6
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bucatini | Bucatini N*6 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bucatini N*6 has 25% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Bucatini has 55% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.1 g).
- Bucatini has 25% more fiber (4 g vs 3 g).
- Only Bucatini lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bucatini
Durum _wheat_ semolina
Bucatini N*6
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bucatini or Bucatini N*6?
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bucatini N*6 has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bucatini has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.