Bucatini vs Bucatini N°6 - Rummo - 500 g
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bucatini | Bucatini N°6 - Rummo - 500 g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bucatini has 55% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.1 g).
- Bucatini has 28% more fiber (4 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Bucatini
Durum _wheat_ semolina
Bucatini N°6 - Rummo - 500 g
Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bucatini or Bucatini N°6 - Rummo - 500 g?
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bucatini has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bucatini has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.