Comparison
Bucatini No. 520 vs Bucatini
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bucatini No. 520 | Bucatini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 375 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 13.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bucatini No. 520 has no saturated fat, while Bucatini has 0.4 g.
- Bucatini has 61% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Bucatini has 11% more fiber (4 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Bucatini No. 520
ORGANIC SEMOLINA (WHEAT)., CONTAINS WHEAT. MADE IN A FACILITY THAT ALSO HANDLES EGGS.
Bucatini
Durum _wheat_ semolina
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bucatini No. 520 or Bucatini?
Overall, Bucatini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bucatini has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bucatini has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.