Bryndza vs Parenica
Overall, Parenica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bryndza | Parenica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 290 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Parenica has 18% less saturated fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Parenica has 30% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.4 g).
- Parenica has 33% more protein (24 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Bryndza
Érlelt juhgomolya (juhtej) (érlelt juhgomolya pasztőrizált juhtejből, érlelt juhgomolya nyers juhtejből), tehéngomolya (tej), ivóvíz, étkezés só.
Parenica
Pasztóőrözött tej, étkezési só, oltóenzim, tejsavbaktérium-kultúrák.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bryndza or Parenica?
Overall, Parenica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bryndza has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bryndza has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.